Did the NDP Violate Canada's Election Laws?

18 Comments
Join the Conversation
Questions Raised About NDP Convention - Photograph by Kim Kim
Questions Raised About NDP Convention - Photograph by Kim Kim
The Conservatives have written to Elections Canada, asking for an investigation into whether the NDP violated election laws during last summer's convention.

On September 4, 2011, a letter to Elections Canada, dated September 1, was released to the media. The letter, written by Arthur Hamilton, a lawyer for the Conservative Party of Canada, seeks an investigation into whether the federal NDP violated the Canada Elections Act during their last convention. The convention was held in Vancouver last June.

Hamilton was quoted as writing, "It appears that the NDP has received what the Commissioner of Elections Canada has deemed to be contributions in contravention of the Elections Act." He went on to write that questions surrounding the allegations and the interpretation of the provisions of the Act are of "significant interest to all political parties."

Allegations Against the NDP by the Conservatives

The signage that appeared during last summer's convention, that celebrated the 50th anniversary of the party, contained the names of several unions including CUPE, the UFCW and the Machinist Union. The presence of these names around the convention hall leads to the possibility that the unions were "sponsoring" the convention. If this is true, the sponsorship could be a violation of the Canada Elections Act.

But, the mere presence of the union names does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the unions made illegal campaign donations to the New Democrats.

What the Canada Elections Act Says

Under the Canada Elections Act, only individuals can legally contribute to registered political parties. Corporations, unions and other associations are prohibited from doing so. These contributions are not restricted to the payment of cash but include donations of goods or labour to a registered political party.

There are also specific provisions dealing with corporations, unions and associations sponsoring such activities as conventions or other events held by registered political parties. They are banned as well under the Act.

However there are exceptions to these rules. If there were not, political parties could never deal with corporations, unions or associations in the day to day running of the party. For example, a political party holding a convention could not rent a hall if the renter of the premises was in fact a corporation.

Corporations, unions and other associations can provide goods and services to a registered political party provided they are paid for those goods and services at commercial or fair market value. Entities that are banned from making political contributions are also allowed to sponsor political events such as a dinner or a convention, provided the sponsorship is done for what the Act says is "commercial value."

What the NDP and the Unions Say

Heather Wilson, the NDP's fundraising director, was quoted in the Toronto Sun as saying, "It is a bit rich coming from from the In-and-Out [Conservative] Party. All the rules have been followed by the NDP... Advertisements and sponsorships at fair-market-value is allowed by the law. Elections Canada is fully aware of this practice."

On September 4, one of the unions that sponsored the NDP convention, the United Food And Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) issued a press release condemning the Conservatives from seeking an investigation.

Wayne Hanley, the national president of Canada's largest private sector union said, "The Conservative Party is well aware that advertisements at fair market value are allowed." He went on to add that the UFCW followed the law.

Hanley also accused the Tories of going after organized labour a few days before Labour Day.

Elections Canada will investigate as to whether the sponsorships of the NDP convention were made at fair market value or whether there were payments that violated the Canada Elections Act.

Arthur Weinreb, Arthur Weinreb

Arthur Weinreb - Weinreb is an author, associate editor and columnist with Canada Free Press and the Canadian Affairs Feature Writer for Suite 101.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 1+4?
18 Comments

Comments

Sep 5, 2011 4:21 AM
Guest :
You know you are being successful when your opponents are trying to find every excuse to discredit you.
Sep 5, 2011 4:21 AM
Guest :
Since when is the Conservative Party concerned with the rules?
Sep 5, 2011 4:46 AM
Guest :
A fair question.
Sep 5, 2011 4:52 AM
Guest :
The author is a supporter of conservative
Sep 5, 2011 4:55 AM
Guest :
Finally they get some of their own medicine. The NDP are always pointingthe finger at everyone else, now they get to be held accountable as well. How can people support a party that is actually against your right to live free?
Sep 5, 2011 5:29 AM
Guest :
I think the conservatives are being exposed for their corporation friendly stand, leaving the little guy out, so it is now time to attack those who are for the working people.
Sep 5, 2011 5:37 AM
Guest :
Hmmm ... this little squawk coming from the Conservative Party of Canada, the same party that was found to be in contempt of Parliament? Rich indeed ...

The ConBots must be afraid ... very afraid ... their caper to ruin Canada and make it into a sycophantic 51st. State may be coming to its denouement.

Canada deserves better than the Conservative Party of Canada, as it presently acts ... thanks for nothing, MacKay. You helped, personally, to ruin this country by handing it to the right-wing hicks who now find the chutzpah to complain about someone else's ethics.
Sep 5, 2011 6:04 AM
Guest :
Oh here comes the slag campaigns......Mr.Harper can't win on his own merritt so why not start a fight with no Jack Layton to defend himself....seriously?
If the conservatives had'nt screwed up so by thus far they would'nt have 3 times the work to do to clean it up!
Sep 5, 2011 6:13 AM
Guest :
My opinion, make it easy for every party to stick their evidence side by side in way that average person can judge. Eg. stick NDP supposed "in and out" type ads in past beside conservative ones in a single web site that each party can update, do rebuttal, etc.

If someone in elections canada gives a tip to a party, eg liberal party to have camera man there at same time as police during a raid, that should be considered a severe crime, as destroys confidence that elections canada is unbiased. Several years in jail may be reasonable for breaking neutrality, and liberal who did not reveal source could also be in jail for a while for contempt of court. A police raid is supposed to be a surprise, a leak to anyone in advance weakens that surprise. A leak to opposition makes it seem that politically motivated. Same thing goes in reverse, if elections canada guy is caught giving conservatives a tip that they are going to be raided, they also would be at risk of jail for years. (Make every elections canada official responsible for neutrality and breaking that a form of treason)

Otherwise, whoever gets control of the elections canada body can rig the elections by having uneven application of rules.
Sep 5, 2011 6:29 AM
Guest :
Of Course the cons are thinking the NDP was up to something...perhaps the next time around NDP will take off and obliterate the cons!
Sep 5, 2011 6:31 AM
Guest :
@ the guy who doesn't like NDP.
UM, doesn't support living free? LOL WHAT ARE YOU ON?
We're talking about a party that supports social programs. Not communist Russia.
And agreed. This rich coming from the conservatives... Really. They break more political regulations than anybody. "LOL I MAKE ARROW AND PUT 'NOT' ABOVE IT. THIS IS SO LEGIT THEY'LL NEVER KNOW."
Tsk tsk...
Sep 5, 2011 6:32 AM
Guest :
Wow the misspelling, poor grammar and one side arguments on this comment board remind me of why Canada is weak in the first place. Its not parties that make a country strong or weak, it is the population. Too bad the day they are held accountable for their personal mismanagement and weakness, will be a day to late for the country.
Sep 5, 2011 6:47 AM
Guest :
"How can people support a party that is actually against your right to live free?"

Hahahahahahahaha......You clearly should write Conservative attack ads. That's rich. I must have missed that in the party platform somewhere. Families! Pensions! Education! And most of all Totalitarian control!!!
Sep 5, 2011 6:48 AM
Guest :
So the NDP may turn out to be hypocritical crooks - no surprise there.

As for the union supporters posting here - I particularly enjoyed the post with the laughable comment about "the little guy" - we are talking about CUPE here, one of the most powerful activist groups in the country with access to the levers of power and who's members are very well paid - hardly "the little guy".
Sep 5, 2011 6:50 AM
Guest :
This year is the most we have ever spent on travels, courtesy of who? Well the Conservatives of course. How many lies and laws broken by the Conservatives that have affected us all? Yet they point the finger to others regarding ethics? The Conservatives are on their way out and the legacy Jack Layton has left behind will be the last one standing. If he were still here, you can bet your house they never would have tried to bring these false allegations to light. Jack Layton still is The People for The People and has done right by us and has left a tender mark on us all. The Conservatives are a jealous flock who will do anything to ruin the reputation of others. Where they have forced votes, NDP has loyal and happy followers who believe in positive change for all people of Canada.
Sep 5, 2011 6:56 AM
Guest :
What I don't understand it why NDPers get so angry? If you did nothing wrong, you've got nothing to worry about.
Sep 5, 2011 10:40 AM
Guest :
Dont the conservatives receive much of their funding through third parties from Corporate entities?. Speaking of fairness, they are scrapping the vote subsidy to cripple opposition parties funding. Sort of like stealing someones cash, then claiming they are keeping offshore bank accounts.
Nov 18, 2011 1:51 PM
Guest :
in-out
18 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement