Google's Cyber Espionage: A Threat Nearly as Great as Nuclear War

3 Comments
Join the Conversation
Small Spy Drones - Frank Hardy
Small Spy Drones - Frank Hardy
Cyber terrorists have penetrated America's infrastructure & some analysts fear her transportation, communication & energy security could be compromised.

The threat to the physical security of the USA is a constant theme broadcast over the airwaves the last decade; however, equally dangerous cases of cyber espionage have received very little unified attention. Nonetheless, in recent weeks Americans have seen a spate of coordinated attacks on parts of her infrastructure. Hackers, (many emanating from Cold War adversaries Russia and China) have successfully penetrated US government agencies, America's military industrial complex and on June 1, 2011 her diplomatic corps. A thorough examination of the attacks and US vulnerability is necessary.

James Bond’s Gadgets

Espionage has always been a dangerous part of conflict between national ideologies and the reasons for spying are as diverse as the spies themselves. For the spy; however, being labeled a spy by his adversary is devastating – but getting caught with unauthorized documents, is usually fatal. Subsequently, with the advancement of technology, the art of spying changed. Lies and clandestineness gave way to paraphernalia and distance.

Miniaturization and magnification reached its apex during the Cold War as smaller and more powerful devices allowed spies to capture significant bits of information from considerable distance. Controversial spies Ethel and Julius Rosenberg supposedly smuggled the complete plans to American’s atomic bomb in a few small suitcases. In 1960, CIA pilot Francis Gary Powers photographed Soviet secrets from the edge of the stratosphere. In 1985 spy John Walker trafficked a top secret radio cipher card to the Soviet Union in an envelope. By 2009, computer technology allowed young Bradley Manning to release over a million documents, affecting nearly every nation on the planet, on a handful of CDs.

The Computer Spy

007 had to sneak into Blofeld’s offices to steal plans for the latest diabolical operation. Today, James would probably be replaced by Moneypenny who, while manipulating Q’s computer virus safely from England, needs only an internet connection to attack SPECTRE. Unfortunately, with an increased reliance on computers for controlling most of a nation’s infrastructure, Blofeld could do the same to England.

A recent PEW poll indicated that a significant percentage of the American population feels there is a need to protect the public by extending the Patriot Act. However, few agencies have examined America’s vulnerability to and the potential harm fresh computer attacks could cause to her financial, communication, energy or transportation networks.

The Cyber War

Government – The first large scale cyber-attacks seemed intent to compromise US government computers. On November 28, 2008, Julian Barnes wrote in The Los Angeles Times, “…a severe and widespread electronic attack on Defense Department computers…may have originated in Russia.”

Military Industrial Complex – While defense department and government computers are desirable sources of information for espionage, they also prove harder for the infiltrator to maintain his or her covertness. Subsequently, spies changed tactics and began focusing on the next link in the chain – the private corporation. On May 22, 2011, America’s largest defense contractor was attacked by foreign entities. Fahmida Rashid of IT Security and Network News wrote on May 27, 2011 “Lockheed Martin has been battling a major disruption to its computer systems after its IT security team detected a network intrusion….” Wayne Rash, also of IT Security Network, insisted on June 1, 2011 that these attacks “…appear to mark an escalation of a cyber-cold war….”

Diplomatic – Following the corporate intrusions at Lockheed, Google discovered individual email accounts were compromised by hackers. Possibly perceived as the weakest link in the security chain, spies augmented their governmental and corporate attacks with assaults on administration workers, including some in the White House. Mike Swift of The Mercury News reported on June 1, 2011 that “…hundreds of Gmail accounts…of senior U.S. officials…were targeted in a concerted hacking campaign originating from Jinan, China.” Swift continued, “….the latest attacks…were intended to spy on U.S....government officials….”

Cybergeddon

Images of espionage and national attacks are prejudiced toward that which is easily observable. It conjures pictures of Japanese spies passing tactical information of American battleship deployments in Pearl Harbor on December 6, 1941. The public can readily grasp the description of an Al Qaida sleeper cell in Washington DC transferring information to terrorist planners in fundamentalist Pakistan. But, who cares if China reads government emails? Computer espionage appears innocuous and less threatening.

However, data incursions initiated by governments, are anything but harmless. America’s national infrastructure is highly computer dependent making it cyber vulnerable. Sebastian Smith, journalist for the Sydney Morning Herald, reported Shawn Henry, assistant director of the FBI stated on January 7, 2009, “Cyber-attacks pose the greatest threat to the United States after nuclear war and weapons of mass destruction.”

Cybergeddon, Smith argues, occurs “when an advanced economy – where almost everything of importance is linked to or controlled by computers - falls prey to hackers….” Wayne Rash forecast such events when he insisted, “ there is a high likelihood it will start attacking other industries as well… banks, an electric utility, or a phone system…are [all] at risk.”

With repeated attacks on America’s infrastructure and diplomatic corps, one could argue Cold War adversaries have begun anew. Russian attacks on the Pentagon’s computers are followed by Chinese assaults on U.S. official’s email accounts. And while politicians view the events as insignificant and not worth jeopardizing financial relations, the fact remains, America is in an extremely sensitivity position and these attacks are as real as any other throughout history.

Captain Frank , Frank Hardy

Frank W. Hardy - Frank has 36 years of airline experience navigating every ocean & continent. Flying 25,000 hours in 42 years presents a rare historical ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 10+9?

Comments

Jun 3, 2011 9:02 PM
Terri Lynn Sullivan :
Interesting read, albeit perhaps a tad bit sensationalized. And are we sure these alleged cyber attacks, if not fabricated like much "terrorist attacks", should be finger pointed to a foreign nation? Could it not be an inside job, as the American people become (rightfully so) more and more weary of the military industrial complex spending 60% of our overall budget on weapons/war, and what is spinned as "defense", while our basic freedoms, liberty, security ironically diminish as direct result (college cost vs free tuition in non-military spending countries just to name one). The "War on terrorism" or war on war has resulted in the loss of more liberties than just about any other time in U.S. History. I hope we are not spreading more fear tactics, and perhaps we need to start fixing our own Fed gov and military extremist regime. It's becoming rather anti-American and certainly not "Patriotic".
Jun 3, 2011 10:53 PM
Frank W. Hardy :
I agree with some of what is said but remember JFK tried to fight the military industrial complex and look where it got him. He was going to withdraw from Vietnam

http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/1963_Vietnam_Withdrawal_Plans

Furthermore, like some good ideas there is usually no thought about what happens if it is implemented. Germany is going to close all of her nuclear power plants and seven have already been shut down permanently – great! Now that is 20% of her total power consumption, where is she going to get that power TODAY? From dirty, polluting, ozone destroying coal, oil or gas because alternate forms will take years to build and get on line.

Well the same with the US Military Industrial Complex, it is not just soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan but also a corporations and a military base near you! While there is a state and territory in the USA that do not have scheduled airline service there is not one state or US territory that does not have an American military base, post or station. This year’s contracts alone total some $202.5 billion in the USA.

http://www.statemaster.com/graph/mil_def_con_exp-military-defense-contra cts-expenditures

That comes out to an astonishing $759 for every man, woman, child in the nation. Now if you include the reoccurring money ($100 billion Boeing Air Force Tanker Deal for example) the annual amount nears $700 billion.

http://www.suite101.com/content/airbus-defeated-by-boeing-on-air-force-t anker-deal-a352884


But that is only the defense department; you must look at the other departments as well who supply to the complex – the energy, transportation, commerce, homeland security, justice and the like. It is estimated that direct defense spending by other departments nears $560 billion annually. For example the Undersecretary for Arms Control has an annual budget of $19 billion, but that department is under the State Department not the Defense Department. Who do you think designed the MREs soldiers eat? Sure it was a modification of the C and K rations of years gone by but the Department of Agriculture provided money to redesign the products not the Defense Department. Same with the Department of Education and certain research projects like Genetic research. It is all intertwined and comes to nearly $3 Trillion annually and tens of millions of jobs – whose going to replace that work Goldman Sacks?

With a national unemployment rate of 9.1% and a true unemployment/underemployment rate over 16% where are we going to get nearly 40 million high paying jobs like these? Jobs ranging from the assembly lines at Boeing in Seattle, to the shipyards of Bath Maine; from Los Alamos labs in New Mexico to research facilities in Tampa Florida – how are we going to replace these jobs?

Last month America added a puny 53K jobs and most were low pay service sector jobs. While the government tries to equate any two jobs, we all know the laid off Lockheed worker last month lost more pay than the hired TGI Friday’s waitress.


And while the government has told Americans that working as a Wal-Mart stock clerk is a respectable job, anyone older than 30 (Pre-Reagan) knows those type of jobs use to go to teens during the summer and after school to pay for their car gas. They were never designed for a father of 4 to pay for a mortgage, healthcare for his kids and food for his family (forget about an education.)

Jun 11, 2011 9:42 AM
Guest :
Some may prey for war, others pray to a higher power, fewer prepare to dig their graves, (who can afford it), and many will simply die.
.
Obvious global cleansing to secure global human resources from depletion and contamination.
3 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement