SeaWorld an "Industry of Hypocrites" Says Activist Ric O'Barry

5 Comments
Join the Conversation
OSHA ruled orca-trainer interaction to be dangerous - Image by matanya; CC 3.0
OSHA ruled orca-trainer interaction to be dangerous - Image by matanya; CC 3.0
As SeaWorld continues to defend its orca operations, the Dolphin Project's, Ric O'Barry calls their rescue efforts a smoke screen.

Orlando, Florida. September 25, 2011. A recent OSHA investigation into the death of SeaWorld trainer Dawn Brancheau caused by orca Tilikum in Feb. 2010, resulted in a $75,000 penalty for the company and the recommendation that SeaWorld institute physical barriers between its trainers and orcas. Fearing the impact to its operations, SeaWorld is currently challenging the ruling in court, forcing the company to defend itself as marine mammal activists cry foul.

SeaWorld case is not going well for the entertainment park

By challenging the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's ruling which resulted in three citations for SeaWorld, the marine entertainment park is increasingly being forced to defend its operations in view of the public eye. Lawyers for the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), accused the entertainment park Wednesday, of not fully documenting all of the acts of aggression towards trainers by its killer whales.

Once Chuck Tompkins, corporate curator of zoological operations for SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment acknowledged that SeaWorld's incident report log, had "missed a few", organizations against marine mammal captivity gained even further ammunition and ratcheted up the pressure a notch.

Two days prior to Tompkin's testimony, Save Japan Dolphins director Ric O'Barry, posted video and written testimony from former SeaWorld trainers who claimed in retrospect, that SeaWorld had failed to fully inform them of the dangers of working with Tilikum and other orcas. Furthermore, testimony by one of SeaWorld's senior trainer's, Lynne Schaber, only appeared to bolster OSHA's claims after she described how 12,000-pound Tilikum, who was known for his failure to release objects, prompted a special section in the training manual specifically dedicated to him.

Under pressure, SeaWorld issues press release

SeaWorld, in an attempt to defend itself publicly, issued a press release on Sep. 23, describing itself as a "global leader in animal care and conservation." Few are aware, the park said, "that SeaWorld operates one of the world's most respected wildlife rescue and release programs and has treated more than 18,000 animals over the last four decades." Yet, these claims were quickly disputed by O'Barry who issued his own press release on Sep. 24, claiming that SeaWorld was merely attempting to "snow the public."

While "SeaWorld saves some animals," O'Barry said, the fact that the park made $1.4 billion in profit last year, makes "their rescue program ... a token effort." O'Barry, a former dolphin trainer turned advocate, added that rescue animals are often kept by SeaWorld and not returned to the wild. Marine parks are finding it more difficult to obtain animals, explains O'Barry, because the "Marine Mammal Protection Act states that the capture of marine mammals for captive purposes must be done in a humane manner." This is not possible in the wild, suggests the Save Japan Dolphins director and founder of The Dolphin Project, so SeaWorld keeps these mammals "by claiming they could not be released back."

AMMPA: "SeaWorld demonstrates a commitment to safety"

Marilee Menard, the Executive Director of the Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks and Aquariums (AMMPA), of which SeaWorld is a member, told Suite101.com, "For the two decades I have worked with the marine mammal community, SeaWorld has always been at the forefront of marine mammal care and has always demonstrated a commitment to the professionalism and safety of their trainers."

AMMPA, which represents marine life parks, aquariums, zoos, research facilities, and professional organizations Menard says, ensures that all, "Alliance members must conduct and/or support scientific research and/or conservation projects related to marine mammals." Unfortunately with the SeaWorld court case still in active litigation, adds Menard, "it would be inappropriate to comment further."

SeaWorld-OSHA hearing in recess until November

After the week-long hearing concluded Friday and was adjourned until November, SeaWorld issued the following written statement. "(In) maintaining a safe environment for our trainers, the demands of humane care require our zoological team to work in close physical proximity to these animals," the park said before adding, "the fact that there have been so few incidents over millions of interactions with killer whales is evidence not just of SeaWorld’s commitment to safety, but to the success of that training and the skill and professionalism of our staff."

O'Barry on the other hand, suggests SeaWorld might better defend itself if it was involved in marine mammal conservation outside of the entertainment industry. If SeaWorld were to help the Dolphin Project Team prevent amusement parks from opening in Thailand, or help to stop the "trafficking and slaughter of thousands of dolphins," in the Solomon Islands or Taiji, said O'Barry, "then SeaWorld might have some credibility." But because they don't he adds, "theirs is an industry of hypocrites ... who choose to pretend the abuse and suffering," is not associated with them.

.

Elizabeth and Streak, Elizabeth Batt

Elizabeth Batt - Elizabeth Batt is a former large animal nurse, certified NREMT, lover of equines and conservationist.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 2+5?

Comments

Sep 26, 2011 3:33 AM
Guest :
If SeaWorld were to help the Dolphin Project Team prevent amusement parks from opening in Thailand, or help to stop the "trafficking and slaughter of thousands of dolphins," in the Solomon Islands or Taiji, said O'Barry, "then SeaWorld might have some credibility."

Sounds like Mr O'Barry is saying that if Sea World pays the conservationist then they won't complain about the captive cetaceans. I believe the Medieval christian church called this indulgences but these days is it better known as a protection racket. If they prevent other parks from being opened then they can continue to operate their existing park, that sounds pretty hypocritical of Mr O'Barry.
Sep 26, 2011 6:57 AM
Elizabeth Batt :
I believe the examples used were just that, examples. I believe Mr. O'Barry's intent was to ask SeaWorld to get involved in any conservation project that helps all dolphins in general who endure duress worldwide, and not just those areas that benefit the dolphin entertainment industry. In essence, care about all dolphins everywhere. From what I can gather, Mr. O'Barry is against captivity in any form, particularly for entertainment purposes. If Mr. O'Barry's intention is misconstrued, then the fault lies with my interpretation of it as a writer. For that I apologize.
Sep 26, 2011 2:48 PM
Guest :
Oh I agree with your assessment. But that means although he is against all dolphin captivity he is willing to overlook it if the people with the captive dolphins give his group money.
Sep 26, 2011 3:15 PM
Elizabeth Batt :
My opinion is I don't believe he would, I really do believe he was just making a point. Perhaps that SeaWorld would find itself on a more stable platform if it broadened its perspectives with hands-on help. Honestly, I'm not sure they would accept money from SeaWorld, considering the majority of their campaign is about ending the exploitation of dolphins for money. I think with the growing outrage against captivity currently underway, it would be easier for some companies (not saying SeaWorld - just generalizing) to pay hush money than deal with the negative press.

But again, this is my personal view and I don't speak for Mr. O'Barry or SeaWorld.

Thanks for stopping by :)
Sep 27, 2011 1:47 PM
Guest :
Does anyone besides me remember that at one point Sea World San Diego had Killer Whales in the public access Dolphin Petting Pool in their park? Here is a picture for proof.

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b171/OrcinusOrca/LJ/MeKotar.jpg

That is me with the Orca. The year was 1980.
They are not dangerous when treated properly and with respect.
have never worked for a Marine Park.
I am not a Trainer.
I have not had any "special training" to be able to do this.

I have though, worked on three separate dolphin communication projects, including John Lilly's JANUS project. I was there and helped Mr. O'Barry with the shipping out of Lilly's two dolphins Joe and Rosie on Flying Tigers to Florida for release when the project shut down.

I got to know this one Orca and three others that were introduced into the tank during the time I was going to college in San Diego. It took over 4 months of being there every Saturday and Sunday all day to get to the point at which the picture was taken. A certain level of trust between us had to be established first. I trusted them and they trusted me. Something I personally do not believe ever has been done by any trainer/handler in any park. For them it's all about control and at the end of the day, they get to go home, but the whale stays in the tank.

And my level of trust was constantly tested by them.

I trusted them enough that on the multiple occasions when one grabbed my arm in his mouth up to the elbow and gently tried to pull me in, I did not panic and was able to convey to him that while I was not afraid to get in the water with him, it was not allowed. Had he wanted to, he could have severely injured me, but he did not. His name is Kotar and as far as I can find out online, at last report, he is still alive and at Sea World Orlando.

Yes, I still have my arm.

Maybe it was my experience on the communication projects that enabled me to do all this.

I am not saying I approve of their captivity, though I do feel that even the largest tanks I have seen with Orcas in them are vastly too small for these intelligent beings. I don't think that a marine park could build a tank large enough for them to be comfortable.

I am saying that they are not treated with the level of respect pursuant with their level of intelligence which, In My Opinion and past experiences, is at least equal to humans. Perhaps the SETI project should look a bit closer to home for a non human intelligence. They do after all inhabit a larger portion of the planet than humans do.

We need to be able to communicate [ not merely sign language, but talk so it is two way ] with them, it is possible. The three projects I've worked on have shown me this is possible. Current research is merely a rehash of work that was done 30 or more years ago and is nothing new. The technology that JANUS used, while cutting edge at the time, was not up to the task.

Today, I believe we have the technology we need to do this. The method I have developed is surprisingly simple and as far as I have been able to determine, never even been attempted. Unfortunately, because I don't have the "required degrees" to my name, my opinions and experiences do not carry any weight to get funding.

I hope the moderator will post this.
5 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement