TSA Complaints Emerge as Travelers Reveal Pat-Down Atrocities

7 Comments
Join the Conversation
Prepare for Airport Delays if Travelers Opt-Out - Photo Courtesy of the TSA
Prepare for Airport Delays if Travelers Opt-Out - Photo Courtesy of the TSA
A woman is forced to show her prosthetic breast to security agents as travelers share their experiences about the TSAs newly enforced pat-down procedure.

Despite the public outrage towards new and invasive screening procedures at nationwide airports, John Pistole, TSA administrator, says they are here to stay. Acknowledging the revealing body scanner and the equally appealing pat-down as "Demeaning," Pistole said on Nov. 22, 2010, that his policy is "Not going to change." Pistole and the TSA – firmly in the spotlight, would be wise to ensure that standard procedures are followed. The horror stories are mounting and the pressure and scrutiny on the government agency, is increasing daily.

Woman forced to show prosthetic breast at Charlotte Douglas International Airport

No-one it appears is exempt from the newly enforced security procedures instituted by the TSA. Cathy Bossi of South Charlotte is a flight attendant who alleges that she was forced to endure both the full-body scanner and the pat-down. Bossi, who was flying on personal business, told Britain's Daily Mail newspaper on Nov. 20, 2010, that TSA agents halted the pat-down when they reached her right breast.

Ms Bossi, reports the Daily Mail in, "Cancer Survivor Forced to Show Prosthetic Breast to TSA Agents During Airport Pat-Down," added that a TSA agent, "Put her full hand on my breast and said, 'What is this?'. And I said, 'It's my prosthesis because I've had breast cancer.' " Bossi then says that she was forced to remove the prosthesis for examination by the security agents.

Complaints mount with new TSA screening policy

Bossi's isn't the first complaint that the TSA has received after the implementation of the new screening procedures. On Nov. 21, 2010, Gina Damron of the Detroit Free Press, reported that 61-year-old Thomas Sawyer warned TSA agents that if he received a pat-down, there was a risk that the seal on his urostomy bag (used to collect urine), would be dislodged. Sawyer claims that the TSA agent ignored his warning, breaking the seal during the pat-down and traumatizing the traveler so intensely, that Sawyer burst into tears.

Another incident that again involved agents at Charlotte Douglas International Airport swirled around a 6-year-old boy who, says his father, was so traumatized by TSA agents grabbing his groin, the boy was left sobbing. Charlotte's, WBTV news who reported the boy's story, contacted the TSA in an attempt to determine whether this type of aggressive pat-down was really necessary for kids. The TSA told the news station that invasive procedures for children were being modified, but refused to say exactly what those modifications were.

National Opt-Out Day is Wednesday Nov. 24, 2010

A grassroots opposition group formed by one man, Brian Sodegren, is rallying against the new TSA policy by asking people to get on board and support a National Opt-Out Day on Nov. 24. Sodegren is begging the public at Optoutday.com to, "Stand up for their rights, stand up for liberty, and protest the federal government's desire to virtually strip us naked or submit to an enhanced pat down."

Sodegren is hoping that the public will support his cry and refuse the full-body scanner in favor of an enhanced pat-down conducted publicly. Aside from impeding the flow of public traffic through security, the opposition group says that a pat-down done publicly, allows the process to be witnessed and every person to, "See for themselves how the TSA treats law-abiding citizens."

The TSA and administrator Pistole, appear to be adamant in its support of both screening procedures. On Nov. 22, 2010, Evan Perez of the Wall Street Journal reported in "Despite Outcry, TSA Insists Pat-Downs Are Here to Stay," that "The U.S. says it plans to have 500 of the scanners, which cost $100,000 apiece, installed in airports by the end of this year, with another 500 installed next year."

With groups such as the ACLU assessing responses to the new TSA policy, the battle it appears, whilst loud, has only just begun. The TSA might be best served to ensure that all procedures are uniformly, fairly and sensibly applied.

Elizabeth and Streak, Elizabeth Batt

Elizabeth Batt - Elizabeth Batt is a former large animal nurse, certified NREMT, lover of equines and conservationist.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 10+1?

Comments

Nov 22, 2010 9:11 AM
Guest :
I have questions about the policy:
Will TSA personnel who touch children's genitals be charged with sexual abuse of a child and be required to forever after register as a sex offender?
Will homosexual passengers have the right to request an opposite sex TSA agent to do the enhanced pat-down?
Will heterosexual TSA personnel have the right to refuse to perform an enhanced pat down on a homosexual passenger? Will passengers be required to reveal their sexual preference so as to give TSA personnel the opportunity to exercise this right?
Will passengers of any sexual preference be entitled to know the sexual preference of the TSA agent about to touch their genitals?
Nov 22, 2010 9:21 AM
Guest :
Don't just "opt out" of naked scanners only to be sexually molested/assaulted, instead. Boycott Flying COMPLETELY, until sanity returns! Please join us: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Flying/126801010710392
Nov 22, 2010 6:41 PM
Guest :
As delicate as this subject can be broached......are showing sanitary pads and removal of tampons in front of TSA next?
Nov 22, 2010 8:13 PM
Guest :
Who is checking the baggage handlers? I heard rumors that these airport employees are not subject to any security checks of any kind.

If this is true, what's keeping them from putting explosives on a plane that they will not be a passenger on?
Nov 23, 2010 6:43 AM
Guest :
One evidence of the TSA's general lack of understanding of the public has been its totally inept PR campaign, for which it is now going to deploy resources (time, people, money) to enhance. It's not that I'm against PR campaigns -- for more than 40+ years, I have been in the communications business, having served numerous organizations at the most senior levels. What I AM against is PR campaigns that are badly executed and ill-conceived, which are the compounded flaws of the TSA. If you want to know my logic in more detail, I wrote about it here: http://www.nuuko.com/2010/11/understanding-pr-the-real-lesson-of-the-tsa-an d-pat-downs/
Nov 23, 2010 2:51 PM
Guest :
Grow up you complainers. I want to know you are not hiding something so my family is safe. Go through the screener; who cares what you look like to the TSA agent. Stop the Tea Party BS>
Nov 24, 2010 9:10 AM
Guest :
I'm a child advocate, and I think anyone who touches a child inappropriately should be charged with sexual abuse.
7 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement